The magician, methods, structures and myths (more myth permutations)

When a person explains a problem to the magician or when the magician itself perceives possible a discourse-psycho-physic problem in other subject, he can interact in relation of two levels: (i) at the structural level and (ii) at meta-structural level.

(i) At the structural level the magician can provide a myth structure to help the other person to find their own myths or heshe can provide a particular myths composition to the other person.

(ii) At the meta-structural level the magician can put aware the other person of the “tyranny of structures” if those are the result of the only imposition of society (so other people than the subject) because freedom requires also the ability to investigate the own mete-structures and to develop new structures or the magician can not to put aware to the other subject about the meta-structural level (may the other subject be already aware).

On the basis of this distinction and procedures, I distingue between enlightening methods and obscuring methods, as they are explained in the tables:

Enlightening methods

Method Subject Structural Procedure Mete-structural Procedure
Enlightening Aware The magician proposes structural forms to the subject To show different myth permutations to the subject The magician suggest the existence of a meta-structural personal own level to the subject Philosophy, to show alternative structures and the myth they allow.
Enlightening Not aware The magician proposes structural forms to the subject To show different myth permutations to the subject The magician suggest the existence of a meta-structural personal own level to the subject Give time to the subject.

 

Obscuring methods

Method Subject Structural Procedure Mete-structural Procedure
Obscuring Aware The magician uses structural forms not explicit to the subject To provide a set of given myths to the subject The magician imposes the existence of a meta-structural invariable level to the subject Say nothing, dogma, “tyranny of structures”.
Obscuring Not aware The magician uses structural forms not explicit to the subject To provide a set of given myths to the subject The magician imposes the meta-structural level (un)conscious to the subject Say nothing, dogma, “tyranny of structures”.

 

Permutaciones del mito 10

 

Anuncis

Deixa un comentari

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

Esteu comentant fent servir el compte WordPress.com. Log Out / Canvia )

Twitter picture

Esteu comentant fent servir el compte Twitter. Log Out / Canvia )

Facebook photo

Esteu comentant fent servir el compte Facebook. Log Out / Canvia )

Google+ photo

Esteu comentant fent servir el compte Google+. Log Out / Canvia )

Connecting to %s